Matilda Tree Finance
← BlogFirst Home Buyers

Rentvesting vs buying your first home: which is right for you?

By Rielle Berglund

Rentvesting vs buying your first home: which is right for you?

Rentvesting (renting where you want to live and buying an investment property somewhere more affordable) and buying your first home are both legitimate paths into the property market. Rentvesting can be a good fit when you want to stay in a high-cost location for work or lifestyle, when investment property fits your longer-term wealth strategy, and when you're comfortable with the tax and cash flow implications. Buying your first home tends to fit when stability, security, and government scheme access matter more, when you want to live in what you own, and when you prefer a simpler tax picture. Neither is universally right or wrong. The choice depends on your specific financial position, life stage, and long-term goals. This guide walks through the trade-offs.

This post complements my earlier Rentvesting: Is it right for you? post. That post explored what rentvesting is. This one puts it side by side with the alternative of buying your own home first, so you can see the comparison clearly.

Both paths are valid. What matters is which one fits your specific situation. Here's how to think about it.

What's the fundamental difference?

Buying your first home means you own the property you live in. Your loan is an owner-occupied home loan, usually with the lowest available interest rates and access to first home buyer schemes. Your mortgage is not tax deductible. Any future capital gain on the property is generally exempt from capital gains tax (under the main residence exemption).

Rentvesting means you rent where you want to live and buy an investment property somewhere else, usually more affordable. Your loan is an investment loan, usually at slightly higher rates. Your mortgage interest and many holding costs are tax deductible. The property is subject to capital gains tax when you sell (though the 50 percent CGT discount applies if you hold for more than 12 months).

When does rentvesting make sense?

Rentvesting tends to be a good fit when:

  • You need or want to live in a high-cost area (usually inner-city Sydney, Melbourne, or Brisbane) where buying is out of reach on your income
  • You value flexibility in where you live (renting means easier moves for work, relationships, or lifestyle)
  • Your career benefits from being in a specific location you couldn't afford to buy in
  • You're comfortable with property investment mechanics (rental income, tax deductions, property management)
  • You have a long-term wealth focus (property is a long-term asset, and rentvesting is a long-term strategy)
  • You have an accountant who can help you optimise the tax position

Rentvesting works best when the numbers on the investment property genuinely make sense as an investment, not just as a way to buy any property. Buying an average investment in a low-growth area just to "get on the ladder" often produces worse long-term outcomes than waiting.

When does buying your first home make sense?

Buying your first home tends to be the better fit when:

  • You want the stability and security of owning where you live (particularly important for women who have experienced housing instability through separation, family violence, or other transitions)
  • You have children and stability of location and schools matters
  • You want access to first home buyer schemes (5% Deposit Scheme, First Home Owner Grant, stamp duty concessions), most of which apply only to owner-occupied purchases
  • You value a simpler tax position (owner-occupied mortgages aren't tax deductible but capital gains are usually exempt)
  • You want to build equity by paying down your own mortgage rather than someone else's
  • You're not planning to move again for at least 5 to 10 years (buying and selling costs eat into any short-term gains)

For single mums in particular, home ownership often carries meaning beyond the financial numbers. It's the version of security a lot of women didn't get to build during their working years for reasons that had nothing to do with capability.

How do the numbers actually compare?

Let me walk through a rough comparison to make this concrete. These numbers are illustrative, not specific to any one situation.

Scenario: buyer with $50,000 saved, $85,000 income, single, no dependants, based in Sydney

Option A: Buy first home in outer suburb ($600,000)

  • Deposit: $30,000 (5% via 5% Deposit Scheme), no LMI
  • Stamp duty: $0 (first home buyer concession)
  • Loan: $570,000 at owner-occupied rate
  • Monthly repayment: approximately $3,900 (30-year P&I)
  • Additional costs: $15,000 to $25,000 (legal, inspections, moving, setup)
  • Ongoing costs: council rates, insurance, maintenance (approximately $6,000 per year)

Option B: Rentvest in more affordable region ($450,000 investment property) + rent in Sydney

  • Deposit: $50,000 (over 10 percent, no LMI)
  • Stamp duty: approximately $15,000 (investment purchase, no concession)
  • Loan: $400,000 at investment rate
  • Monthly repayment: approximately $2,900 (30-year P&I) OR $2,300 (interest-only)
  • Rental income: approximately $23,000 per year gross ($17,000 net after fees)
  • Rental payment in Sydney: approximately $30,000 per year for a modest apartment
  • Tax deductible: mortgage interest, property management fees, insurance, depreciation

The rentvesting numbers look tighter on paper, but the tax deductions can shift the picture significantly, particularly for higher-income earners. The buy-first numbers look bigger on paper, but the equity build-up is entirely in your own name and the property is your home.

Which produces a better long-term outcome depends on:

  • Growth rates of the two potential locations
  • Rental yields
  • Your marginal tax rate
  • How long you hold the property
  • Rate movements over the period
  • What you do with any tax savings from rentvesting

An accountant can run these numbers properly for your specific situation. Rough numbers on a blog post can only take you so far.

What are the tax implications?

Buying your first home:

  • Mortgage interest not tax deductible
  • Capital gain on sale generally exempt (main residence exemption)
  • Property expenses generally not deductible
  • No requirement to declare property income (because you don't earn any)
  • Straightforward tax position

Rentvesting:

  • Mortgage interest tax deductible against rental income (and other income if the property is negatively geared)
  • Property expenses (management fees, insurance, repairs, depreciation) tax deductible
  • Rental income taxable
  • Capital gain subject to CGT when sold (50% discount if held over 12 months)
  • More complex tax position, requires a good accountant

For a woman on a high marginal tax rate with strong investment property fundamentals, the tax benefits of rentvesting can be significant. For someone on a lower marginal rate, the tax benefits are smaller and the simplicity of owner-occupied home buying often wins.

This is why an accountant conversation matters before deciding. Neither strategy is right in isolation. Both need to be modelled against your specific tax position.

What about lifestyle and security?

The financial comparison only tells part of the story.

Home ownership carries emotional and practical value that doesn't show up on a spreadsheet. Being able to paint the walls. Getting a dog without asking a landlord. Knowing that no one can tell you to move. For women who have experienced housing insecurity (particularly after separation or family violence), this stability can be genuinely healing in ways that go beyond the financial return.

Renting, on the other hand, carries flexibility. Being able to move for a better opportunity. Not being tied to one location. Not being responsible for maintenance when the hot water system breaks. For younger women, women whose careers involve mobility, or women who aren't yet sure where they want to settle long-term, this flexibility has real value.

Neither of these is more valid than the other. They just serve different life priorities at different life stages.

What about single parents specifically?

For single parents, the calculation often tips toward buying your first home rather than rentvesting.

Reasons:

  • The Australian Government 5% Deposit Scheme allows single parents to buy with just a 2 percent deposit, no LMI, for owner-occupied purchases. This is a significantly better deal than most rentvesting scenarios
  • Stability of location matters more when children are involved, particularly if school catchments and support networks are established
  • Simplicity matters more when you're already navigating a complex life with limited time
  • Emotional security of owning the family home matters more after separation or loss

That said, rentvesting can still work for single parents in specific situations: strong career-based income, high-cost area constraints, longer-term wealth focus with a comfortable current rental arrangement.

How do I decide?

Ask yourself:

  • Where do I want to live for the next 5 to 10 years? If the answer is a location you can afford to buy in, buying tends to make sense. If it's not, rentvesting is worth considering.
  • What's my long-term goal for the property? Home to live in? Wealth-building vehicle? Family security asset? Different goals lead to different structures.
  • How simple do I want my tax and financial position to be? Rentvesting adds complexity. Home ownership doesn't.
  • What matters more right now: stability or flexibility? Both are legitimate priorities. The right choice for you depends on your life stage.
  • Have I talked to an accountant? If the numbers are close, the tax modelling matters. Don't decide based on gut feel alone.

A mortgage broker who works across both owner-occupied and investment lending can walk you through what's realistically possible in both paths. An accountant can model the tax implications. Together, they help you see the choice clearly enough to decide.

Frequently asked questions

Can I do both (buy my own home and invest)?

Yes, and many buyers do exactly this, sequentially rather than at the same time. Buy your first home, build equity, then use that equity to fund an investment property purchase later. This is often the simplest sequence for building both housing security and long-term wealth.

Does rentvesting mean I've missed out on being a first home buyer?

Yes, in most cases. If your investment property is the first property you own, you generally can't claim first home buyer benefits (5% Deposit Scheme, First Home Owner Grant, stamp duty concessions) on a later owner-occupied purchase. Some state schemes have specific rules on this, so check the current position in your state before deciding.

What happens if I buy my first home and want to convert it to an investment later?

This is common. Many buyers live in their first home for a few years, then move (for work, relationships, family) and rent out the original property as an investment. The tax implications shift once it becomes an investment (mortgage interest becomes deductible from that point, main residence exemption may partly still apply depending on how long you lived there). An accountant can walk you through the specific rules.

Is rentvesting still worthwhile with high interest rates?

It depends on the specific property, your tax position, and the rental income. High interest rates increase holding costs (which are largely tax deductible) but also affect capital growth. Rentvesting can still work in a high-rate environment, but the numbers need to be modelled more carefully. This is a conversation for your broker and accountant, not a gut-feel decision.

This article is general information only and does not constitute financial, legal or tax advice. Please speak to a licensed financial adviser, solicitor and your accountant about your specific circumstances.

Rielle Berglund is a mortgage broker and the founder of Matilda Tree Finance. She works with Australian women navigating major financial transitions, including separation, divorce, terminal illness and bereavement. She is also the creator of Runa, a free financial literacy app built for exactly this stage of life.

Book a confidential conversation with Rielle at matildatreefinance.com.au or start with Runa, free, at runaapp.com.au.

You may also find these helpful

Sources and references

This article draws on Rielle Berglund's professional experience as a mortgage broker. The following sources are relevant to topics covered:

Ready to take the next step?

Book a free 30-minute discovery call. No obligation. By the end you'll know what's possible for your situation.

Book a free discovery call

Newsletter

Stay in the loop

Occasional updates on rates, lending changes and first home buyer support. No more than a couple of emails a month, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

We will never share your details. Every email includes an unsubscribe link.